Strategic Choices The author of this report is asked to do a few things within this report. First, the author is to look at and assess the Grand Strategy Selection Matrix. Second, the author is to review and assess the general business model and strategy of Overstock.com. The author of this report is to then select which of the quadrants that Overstock falls within. While it may be a little difficult to pin them down as they are like other online companies in many ways and they are also different in many ways, the choice is pretty clear to the author of this report which one applies to them.

There are, of course, four cells in the Grand Strategy matrix and they are numbered I, II, III and IV. The first cell is for companies that are in turnarounds or re-entrenchment status, are divesting or are liquidating. Examples of firms who have been in this situation are Nokia, RIM (Blackberry), Sony and Yahoo. Cell two is for those that are undergoing vertical...

Example of this cell would include Delta (circa 2012). Cell three is for firms with horizontal integration, concentric diversification and joint ventures. Examples of the third sell would include Apple. The fourth cell is for firms with concentrated growth, market development, product development and innovation. Firms in this sphere would be smartphone and social media game-maker Zynga (Ning, 2014).
In terms of where Overstock fits into this quadrant, there are a few factors to consider. In looking at the stock trends for Overstock over the recent years, there is not a lot of good to report on. Indeed, Overstock is essentially flat over the last ten years but they have swung all over the place in the interim. The started at about twelve dollars and spiked all the way up to more than seventy bucks a share at the end of 2004. However, they quickly plummeted down to ten bucks as of January 2008 and they've…